A Silent Hormone Saboteur in Your Produce
When the Environmental Working Group (EWG) tested thousands of produce samples for their 2025 Dirty Dozen™ report, they weren’t only counting pesticide residues. For the first time, they factored in the toxicity of those residues in combination. The results were sobering. Some foods carried over 50 distinct chemical residues per sample, even after being washed the same way you would prepare them at home (1).
Among the familiar top offenders, two new entries stood out: blackberries and potatoes. Blackberries made the list simply because they had never been tested before and immediately ranked high for both residue count and toxicity. Potatoes reappeared after years off the list, primarily due to chlorpropham, a plant growth regulator banned in the European Union for safety concerns (2).
This matters because pesticide residues are not just an environmental issue. They can affect how your metabolism operates day to day. Certain fungicides and insecticides are known endocrine disruptors, capable of interfering with thyroid function, estrogen balance, insulin sensitivity, and the neural regulation of appetite (3; 4). Over time, these changes can tilt the internal chemistry that decides whether your body burns or stores fat.
Why the 2025 List Hits Different
The EWG’s expanded scoring system doesn’t stop at how many pesticides are present.
It looks at:
- Detection frequency — the percentage of samples with at least one pesticide detected.
- Residue diversity — the average number of pesticides per sample.
- Concentration — the average amount of each detected pesticide.
- Toxicity score — the concentration relative to a dose known to cause harm in animal studies.
This last factor is where the rankings shifted. Many items that weren’t high on the list in previous years suddenly climbed because their residue profile, the combination of chemicals, was more dangerous than their residue count alone would suggest (1).
For example, spinach topped the list again because it scored high in every category. The USDA data used for the ranking showed an exceptionally high weight of pesticide residue compared to other produce. That means not only are the residues frequent and diverse, they’re present in higher total amounts by weight (5).
Why Small Daily Exposures Matter
The regulatory system tests each pesticide in isolation, setting “safe” thresholds for human exposure. In reality, the food on your plate carries a cocktail of residues, many of which affect similar biological systems. This “cocktail effect” can amplify disruption in ways that isolated testing doesn’t capture (6).
For instance:
- Pyrimethanil and fludioxonil (fungicides often found on berries and greens) have been linked to hormone receptor interference, particularly in thyroid signaling (3).
- Permethrin and other pyrethroid insecticides can alter nerve transmission and have been associated with changes in resting energy expenditure (4; 7).
- Neonicotinoids like imidacloprid can influence insulin regulation and impair mitochondrial function in early research models (8).
The cumulative effect of eating these residues daily, especially from high-ranking produce, can shift your metabolism away from optimal fat burning and recovery. Even if you are training consistently and eating nutrient-dense foods, chemical interference at the hormonal level can slow your results.
💡 Key Takeaway: The 2025 Dirty Dozen™ highlights that it’s not only the amount of pesticides on your produce that matters, but the type and combination. These hidden residues can quietly disrupt hormonal balance and metabolic efficiency, making strategic shopping an overlooked tool for protecting fat loss progress.
The 2025 Dirty Dozen and Their Hidden Risks
Each year, the Environmental Working Group updates its Dirty Dozen™ list to guide consumers toward safer produce choices. The 2025 update stands out because it not only lists foods with the highest pesticide residues but also weighs how toxic those pesticides are when consumed together.
The 2025 Dirty Dozen™
- Spinach
- Strawberries
- Kale, collard, and mustard greens
- Grapes
- Peaches
- Cherries
- Nectarines
- Pears
- Apples
- Blackberries* (new)
- Blueberries
- Potatoes* (returning)
Plus Items – flagged for high pesticide load despite ranking just below the top twelve:
- Bell and hot peppers
- Green beans
Spinach again claims the top spot due to its consistently high residue weight per serving. The USDA’s testing from 2015–2016 revealed that spinach not only has frequent detections but also high total pesticide concentration compared to other produce (9).
Chemicals of Concern on the Dirty Dozen™
Fungicides:
- Pyrimethanil and fludioxonil appear frequently on berries, greens, and grapes. Studies indicate these compounds can disrupt thyroid hormone receptors, which are central to regulating resting metabolic rate (3; 10).
Insecticides:
- Permethrin and cypermethrin (pyrethroids) are common on leafy greens and fruits. These chemicals can alter sodium channel function in nerve cells, which may reduce neuromuscular efficiency and daily energy expenditure (4,7,11).
Neonicotinoids:
- Imidacloprid and acetamiprid are systemic insecticides detected on items like apples, pears, and cherries. Animal studies and early human data suggest links to insulin dysregulation and mitochondrial impairment (8,12).
Banned Organophosphates:
- Acephate remains detectable in some conventional green beans despite being banned in the U.S. for residential use in 2011. Organophosphates are well documented for their neurotoxic effects and links to hormonal disruption (13).
Why Combination Exposure Is More Harmful
While regulatory agencies test and set limits for each pesticide separately, this does not reflect real-world consumption. You rarely eat one type of residue in isolation. Multiple compounds may interact in ways that amplify endocrine disruption, oxidative stress, or mitochondrial dysfunction (6;14).
For example, a single serving of conventionally grown spinach could contain pyrethroids, fungicides, and neonicotinoids simultaneously. Individually, each might fall below its “safe” limit. Together, their combined effect on hormone receptors, nerve signaling, and cellular energy production could be more significant than any single exposure alone (14).
Why It Matters for Hormone and Metabolic Health
- Thyroid Suppression: Chemicals that block or alter thyroid hormone receptor binding can slow the rate at which your body burns energy at rest (3,10).
- Insulin Resistance: Pesticides affecting glucose uptake and mitochondrial function can impair your ability to switch between carb and fat burning (8; 12).
- Neuroendocrine Disruption: Compounds impacting nerve conduction may reduce movement efficiency, lowering non-exercise calorie burn (4; 7; 11).
The result is not immediate weight gain but a gradual shift in your body’s baseline, where fat storage becomes slightly more favored, recovery slightly slower, and energy levels subtly lower over time.
💡 Key Takeaway: The danger from the Dirty Dozen™ foods comes from both the variety and the combination of pesticides they carry. This chemical “stacking” can interfere with thyroid function, insulin signaling, and energy regulation, all critical levers for sustaining fat loss.
Clean Fifteen and Smarter Shopping Strategies
The Environmental Working Group doesn’t stop at the Dirty Dozen™. They also release the Clean Fifteen™, a list of fruits and vegetables with the lowest detected pesticide residues. This list is your budget-friendly map for where conventional produce is generally safe to buy.
The 2025 Clean Fifteen™
- Pineapple
- Sweet corn (fresh and frozen)
- Avocados
- Papaya
- Onions
- Sweet peas (frozen)
- Asparagus
- Cabbage
- Watermelon
- Cauliflower
- Bananas
- Mangoes
- Carrots
- Mushrooms
- Kiwi
Nearly 60 percent of Clean Fifteen samples had no detectable pesticide residues, and only 16 percent carried residues from two or more pesticides (15). In addition, the top six items did not have more than three different pesticide residues in any sample tested (15).
Using the Lists Strategically
1. Prioritize Organic for the High-Risk Foods
If going completely organic is not realistic, start with the Dirty Dozen™ and Plus items. Frozen organic berries, for example, often cost less than fresh and maintain comparable nutrient content (16).
2. Use the Clean Fifteen™ to Stretch Your Budget
Buying conventional avocados or onions frees up resources to purchase organic spinach or grapes, both of which rank high for pesticide load and toxicity (1; 9).
3. Wash and Prep with Purpose
While washing won’t remove all pesticides, it can reduce surface residues.
Best practices include:
- Rinsing produce under cold running water for at least 20 seconds.
- Using a soft brush on firm produce like potatoes, carrots, or apples.
- Removing outer leaves from leafy greens.
- Peeling thick-skinned produce like cucumbers and mangos (17).
4. Seek Out Local or Regenerative Farms
Small-scale farms often use fewer chemical inputs, even if they’re not certified organic. Farmers markets provide opportunities to ask growers directly about their pest control practices (18).
Why These Swaps Matter for Metabolism
Lowering your intake of high-risk pesticides reduces potential endocrine disruption, which can:
- Support steadier thyroid output for more consistent energy expenditure (3; 10).
- Improve insulin sensitivity, helping your body switch more easily between fat and carbohydrate metabolism (8; 12).
- Reduce oxidative stress, supporting recovery and exercise capacity (14; 19).
Even small changes, like swapping conventional strawberries for frozen organic, can meaningfully lower total pesticide exposure over time.
💡 Key Takeaway: Using the Dirty Dozen™ and Clean Fifteen™ together lets you lower toxic exposure without overspending. Strategic swaps protect hormone balance, energy production, and fat loss momentum.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Dirty Dozen™ and why should I care?
The Dirty Dozen™ is an annual list from the Environmental Working Group highlighting the fruits and vegetables most contaminated with pesticide residues. Many of these chemicals are linked to hormone disruption, nervous system effects, and metabolic interference, making them relevant to anyone focused on fat loss and long-term health.
How does the EWG decide which produce makes the list?
They analyze USDA pesticide residue data, scoring each crop based on detection frequency, number of different pesticides, total concentration, and overall toxicity relative to doses shown to cause harm in animal studies.
Are pesticides really a big deal for metabolism?
Yes. Certain pesticide classes can affect thyroid function, insulin sensitivity, and mitochondrial efficiency, all of which play key roles in whether your body burns or stores fat.
What if I can’t buy all organic produce?
Use the Dirty Dozen™ to identify the high-risk foods worth buying organic, and the Clean Fifteen™ to know where conventional options are generally safe. This lets you prioritize without overspending.
Does washing or peeling make produce pesticide-free?
No. Washing can reduce surface residues but cannot remove systemic pesticides that are absorbed into the plant during growth. Peeling helps for thick-skinned produce but also removes some fiber and nutrients.
✏︎ The Bottom Line
The 2025 Dirty Dozen™ report shows that pesticides are not only an environmental concern but also a daily metabolic variable. Choosing organic for high-risk items, using the Clean Fifteen™ to balance cost, and improving prep methods can reduce your toxic load. These shifts protect hormone balance, energy production, and recovery, all of which are critical for sustainable fat loss.
If you want a step-by-step system to identify and fix hidden fat loss blockers, PlateauBreaker™’s DietFix™ gives you a proven plan without calorie-cutting extremes. Start cleaning up your food environment today and give your metabolism the clear signals it needs to work with you, not against you.
Randell’s Summary
The Environmental Working Group’s 2025 Dirty Dozen™ report delivers a sharper warning than ever by ranking produce not only by the number of pesticide residues but also by the combined toxicity of those chemicals. Spinach tops the list again, joined this year by two newcomers, blackberries and potatoes, both flagged for high-risk residues including compounds banned in other countries. USDA testing showed that even after washing, 75 percent of conventional produce carried pesticides, and Dirty Dozen™ items often had over 50 distinct residues on a single sample.
These chemicals are not harmless traces. Fungicides like pyrimethanil can interfere with thyroid signaling, pyrethroid insecticides can alter nerve conduction and reduce daily calorie burn, and neonicotinoids can disrupt insulin regulation and mitochondrial function. The bigger problem is the “cocktail effect” where multiple low-dose exposures amplify each other’s endocrine and metabolic impacts, something current safety testing does not address.
The Clean Fifteen™ list offers a counterbalance, highlighting produce with minimal residues such as avocados, onions, and pineapples. Using both lists strategically lets you reduce toxic load without overspending. Go organic for the high-risk foods, buy conventional for the low-risk ones, and improve your washing and prep habits. Even small swaps like choosing frozen organic berries over conventional can meaningfully lower exposure.
For metabolism and fat loss, cutting pesticide load supports steadier thyroid output, better insulin sensitivity, and more efficient energy production, all of which keep your body primed for burning fat rather than storing it. The takeaway is simple: smarter shopping is not just about nutrition; it is a quiet but powerful lever for protecting your hormones and sustaining fat loss momentum.
Bibliography
- Environmental Working Group. 2025 Shopper’s Guide to Pesticides in Produce™. https://www.ewg.org/foodnews/
- European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) et al. “Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance chlorpropham.” EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority vol. 15,7 e04903. 26 Jul. 2017, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4903. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7009977/
- Vandenberg, Laura N et al. “Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.” Endocrine reviews vol. 33,3 (2012): 378-455. doi:10.1210/er.2011-1050. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22419778/
- Shafer, Timothy J et al. “Developmental neurotoxicity of pyrethroid insecticides: critical review and future research needs.” Environmental health perspectives vol. 113,2 (2005): 123-36. doi:10.1289/ehp.7254. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1277854/
- U.S. Department of Agriculture. Pesticide Data Program Annual Summary. https://www.ams.usda.gov/datasets/pdp
- Kortenkamp, Andreas. “Low dose mixture effects of endocrine disrupters and their implications for regulatory thresholds in chemical risk assessment.” Current opinion in pharmacology vol. 19 (2014): 105-11. doi:10.1016/j.coph.2014.08.006. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25244397/
- Wolansky, M J, and J A Harrill. “Neurobehavioral toxicology of pyrethroid insecticides in adult animals: a critical review.” Neurotoxicology and teratology vol. 30,2 (2008): 55-78. doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2007.10.005. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18206347/
- Vuong, Ann M et al. “Associations of neonicotinoids with insulin and glucose homeostasis parameters in US adults: NHANES 2015-2016.” Chemosphere vol. 286,Pt 1 (2022): 131642. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131642. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34351280/
- EWG analysis of USDA PDP spinach data (2015–2016). https://www.ewg.org/foodnews/spinach.php
- Zoeller, R Thomas. “Environmental chemicals as thyroid hormone analogues: new studies indicate that thyroid hormone receptors are targets of industrial chemicals?.” Molecular and cellular endocrinologyvol. 242,1-2 (2005): 10-5. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2005.07.006. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16150534/
- Soderlund, David M et al. “Mechanisms of pyrethroid neurotoxicity: implications for cumulative risk assessment.” Toxicology vol. 171,1 (2002): 3-59. doi:10.1016/s0300-483x(01)00569-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11812616/
- Fazakerley, Daniel J et al. “Mitochondrial oxidative stress causes insulin resistance without disrupting oxidative phosphorylation.” The Journal of biological chemistry vol. 293,19 (2018): 7315-7328. doi:10.1074/jbc.RA117.001254. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29599292/
- Rauh, Virginia A et al. “Impact of prenatal chlorpyrifos exposure on neurodevelopment in the first 3 years of life among inner-city children.” Pediatrics vol. 118,6 (2006): e1845-59. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-0338. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17116700/
- Margina, Denisa et al. “Overview of the effects of chemical mixtures with endocrine disrupting activity in the context of real-life risk simulation: An integrative approach (Review).” World Academy of Sciences journal vol. 1,4 (2019): 157-164. doi:10.3892/wasj.2019.17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7188405/
- Environmental Working Group. 2025 Clean Fifteen™ list. https://www.ewg.org/foodnews/clean-fifteen.php
- Rickman, Joy C., Diane M. Barrett, and Christine M. Bruhn. “Nutritional Comparison of Fresh, Frozen and Canned Fruits and Vegetables. Part 1. Vitamins C and B and Phenolic Compounds.” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 87, no. 6, 2007, pp. 930–944. Wiley, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2825
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “Food Safety: Washing Fruits and Vegetables.” https://www.fda.gov/food/
- Reganold, John P, and Jonathan M Wachter. “Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century.” Nature plantsvol. 2 15221. 3 Feb. 2016, doi:10.1038/nplants.2015.221. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27249193/
- Rani, Vibha et al. “Oxidative stress and metabolic disorders: Pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies.” Life sciences vol. 148 (2016): 183-93. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2016.02.002. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26851532/
